Close Menu
The Westside GazetteThe Westside Gazette
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Media Kit
    • Political Rate Sheet
    • Links
      • NNPA Links
      • Archives
    • SUBMIT YOUR VIDEO
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The Westside GazetteThe Westside Gazette
    Advertise With Us
    • Home
    • News
      • National
      • Local
      • International
      • Business
      • Releases
    • Entertainment
      • Photo Gallery
      • Arts
    • Politics
    • OP-ED
      • Opinions
      • Editorials
      • Black History
    • Lifestyle
      • Health
      • HIV/AIDS Supplements
      • Advice
      • Religion
      • Obituaries
    • Sports
      • Local
      • National Sports
    • Podcast and Livestreams
      • Just A Lil Bit
      • Two Minute Warning Series
    The Westside GazetteThe Westside Gazette
    You are at:Home » Sour on Spoilers
    Opinions

    Sour on Spoilers

    June 5, 20243 Mins Read7 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Barry Rosenberg
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email
    Advertisement

    By Barry Rosenberg

    There are currently three third party candidates for president: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Jill Stein and Cornell West. All three candidates claim they are running to give voters a choice and a chance to voice their views. All three insist they are not “spoilers.” Let’s examine this.

    In the last century, the most successful third party candidate was Ross Perot, with less than nineteen per cent of the popular vote in 1992. Voting third party is a “choice” to vote for someone who will not win. However, Teddy Roosevelt helped Wilson defeat Taft in 2012 and Ralph Nader helped Bush defeat Gore in 2000. They were “spoilers.” Polls indicate the Biden-Trump race may be close enough to allow a “spoiler” to decide the election.

    The best way to create choice is to promote a voting system such as ranked choice voting, approval voting, or star voting.

    They all allow voters to vote for whom they like without fear of the “spoiler” effect and each of those methods increase the chance of a third party victory because they each remove the fear of voting one’s conscience.

    For example, if you like Cornell West more than any other candidate, and if your state chose to switch to ranked choice voting for elections (it is already happening in some states), you can vote for Dr. West as your first choice without considering him a spoiler because you also get to choose one of the two major party candidates as your number two choice. Then, if no one gets 50 percent (plus one) and your first choice candidate actually comes in third, your second choice goes to an “instant runoff” and you have both voted with your conscience and your “realpolitik” power. You have not wasted your vote; you have not enabled the victory of someone you are horrified to see win.

    That system especially favors “down ballot” chances for electing (for example) an independent House or Senate member.

    The best ways to use your “voice” include letters to the editor, letters to candidates and elected officials, social media posts, peaceful demonstrations and thoughtful donations- donations to causes, not necessarily to candidates with no chance of winning.

    If you want to create choice, you are better off changing our voting system than you are by voting for a “spoiler.” Your “spoiler vote” could help to defeat someone you yourself consider the best candidate with a real chance to win.

         Barry Rosenberg is a political activist with Swing Blue Alliance, We the People Mass, and Indivisible Westford.

    If you want to create choice
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Carma Henry

    Carma Lynn Henry Westside Gazette Newspaper 545 N.W. 7th Terrace, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33311 Office: (954) 525-1489 Fax: (954) 525-1861

    Related Posts

    A Wedding Party That Looked Like a Funeral

    September 9, 2026

    ICE: Immigrant Cruelty Enforcers

    September 9, 2026

    When America Bombs a Wedding, It Must Answer: The Moral Failure Behind the Sirik Strike

    September 9, 2026

    (Please enter your Payment methods data on the settings pages.)
    Advertisement

    View Our E-Editon

    Advertisement

    –>

    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    advertisement

    Advertisement

    –>

    The Westside Gazette
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 The Westside Gazette - Site Designed by No Regret Media.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Go to mobile version