By Ben Jealous
Thereâs been a lot of news about the Democratic legislators in Texas who fled the state to prevent Republicans from pushing through sweeping new voter suppression laws. Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to have them arrested to force them to attend a special session of the state legislature. Now it turns out that voter suppression is not the only âspecialâ project Abbott has in mind. He and his fellow Republicans are pushing a far-reaching âmemory lawâ that would limit teaching about racism and civil rights.
Abbott already signed a bill last month restricting how racism can be taught in Texas schools. But he and other Republicans in the state donât think it went far enough. The Republican-dominated state-Senate has voted to strip a requirement that white supremacy be taught as morally wrong. Also on the chopping block: requirements that students learn about civil rights activists Frederick Douglass, Susan B. Anthony, Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta.
Itâs not just Texas. Just as Republicans are pushing a wave of voter registration laws around the country, they are also pushing laws to restrict teaching about racism in our history, culture, and institutions. CNNâs Julian Zelizer recently noted that such laws downplay injustices in our history and lead to teaching âpropaganda rather than history.â
Hereâs a good example:  Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said the new legislation is meant to keep students from being âindoctrinatedâ by the âridiculous leftist narrative that America and our Constitution are rooted in racism.â If Patrick really believes it is a âridiculousâ idea that racism was embedded in our Constitution from the start, he has already put on his own ideological blinders. And he wants to force them onto teachers and students.
Some of these state memory laws specifically ban teaching that causes âdiscomfort, guilt, anguish or any other form of psychological distress on account of the individualâs race or sex.â As educators have noted, thatâs a recipe for erasing and whitewashing history.
âTeachers in high schools cannot exclude the possibility that the history of slavery, lynchingâs and voter suppression will make some non-Black students uncomfortable,â history professor Timothy Snyder wrote in the New York Times Magazine. Those laws give power to white students and parents to censor honest teaching of history. âIt is not exactly unusual for white people in America to express the view that they are being treated unfairly; now such an opinion could bring history classes to a halt.â
Snyder also explained how new state âmemory lawsâ are connected to voter suppression. âIn most cases, the new American memory laws have been passed by state legislatures that, in the same session, have passed laws designed to make voting more difficult,â he wrote. âThe memory management enables the voter suppression.â
âThe history of denying Black people the vote is shameful,â he explained. âThis means that it is less likely to be taught where teachers are mandated to protect young people from feeling shame. The history of denying Black people the vote involves law and society. This means that it is less likely to be taught where teachers are mandated to tell students that racism is only personal prejudice.â
As I wrote in The Nation, far-right attempts to suppress honest teaching about racism is meant to âconvince a segment of white voters that they should fear and fight our emerging multiracial and multiethnic democratic societyâ and to âhelp far-right politicians take and hold power, no matter the cost to our democracy.â
Thatâs also what voter suppression bills are designed to do. We cannot tolerate either of these assaults on democracy.