By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Contributor @StacyBrownMedia
A source who can only be identified as a âneutralâ Montgomery County Court official claims a tape played in court that helped convict Bill Cosby was either doctored or partly erased and the original recording contained information that would exonerate the comedian.
âNo one in the media, no one on the defense really has either asked me or pressed me or, to my knowledge, anyone else about the tape,â said the individual, who has requested anonymity because identification could lead to employment loss and other sanctions.
The recording in question aired during Cosbyâs trial in April before a jury found him guilty of three counts of aggravated indecent assault for providing Benadryl tablets to former Temple University employee Andrea Constand and then engaging in foreplay where he touched her under her pants and she touched his penis.
âWhat did you give my daughter? I know my daughter âŚ.,â Gianna Constand, Andreaâs mother, said in a decades-old conversation with Cosby.
However, a source said whatâs been omitted from the tape could prove Cosbyâs innocence.
âWhatâs not on the tape are two things. It was not whatâs been reported that this is some angry person,â the source said.
âShe said, âLook Bill, I know my daughter, and something is wrong with my daughter. Bill, I have to tell you something, what did you give my daughter?ââ
While that might sound consistent to the recording played inside the Montgomery County Courthouse in Pennsylvania, the source said hereâs where the change or omission occurred.
âMr. Cosby said to her, asked her point blank, âAre you accusing me of date rape?â Mr. Cosby was incredulous because he knew, and Gianna knew that he and Andreaâs relationship was consensual,â the source said.
Gianna Constand continued, according to the source:
âShe said no, she wasnât accusing him of date rape, but then you get to see her real motivation which was money because she said to him, âBill, things are tough, I donât know how Iâm going to make itâ â and this is a married woman saying this so Mr. Cosby â just goes on to apologize for having the relationship with her daughter and she told him that his apology was enough and that she didnât want anything else.â
When Cosby overheard a noise on the phone, he asked Constand whether he was being recorded and she denied she was recording saying that the sound was her pet parrot.
Testimony revealed that even while Constand surreptitiously recorded Cosby, she had already first searched for a civil lawyer and then called police.
âThey ran out of money and this was a way of them getting money and Gianna Constand hated Blacks,â said Robert Russell, a former friend of the Constand family whose potential bombshell testimony was not allowed by Judge Steven T. OâNeill.
Russell said he was prepared to testify that Andrea Constand, at her motherâs direction, plotted to extort Cosby, who eventually settled a civil suit with Constand for $3.4 million.
Throughout the trial, those not in the courtroom were provided the mainstream mediaâs version of the tape, which many neutral observers said included so much bias that they believed the media worked in concert with prosecutors to convict Cosby and decimate his legacy.
For instance, it was widely reported in headlines and leads that âCosby admits being a dirty old man.â
However, the tape clearly reveals Cosby saying, âI donât want you to think that Iâm a dirty old man.â
âThatâs a huge difference,â said Jonathan Burwell, a Philadelphia resident.
Another gentlemen at the Panera Bread on 12th and Arch Street agreed.
âIâm not sure what to make of the reporting by [mainstream media] but I do know something was amiss. It just sounded pro-prosecution from the beginning and, as it turned out, they were intent on destroying Cosby and his legacy and itâs another shot at Black people in this era of Donald Trump,â said Archie Crenshaw of Delaware County.
Famed forensic psychiatrist Carole Lieberman, who has years of experience in hundreds of civil and criminal trials, said itâs appalling to discover â after Cosbyâs conviction â that Gianna Constand may have doctored or left out parts of the recording that could have changed the face of the trial.
âTo be honest, I always suspected that there was something off with his accuser and her story. The defense obviously did not do a good enough job for Cosby despite the hundreds of thousands they were paid,â Lieberman said.
âThey should have sent this tape to a forensic analyst who would have been able to
tell that it was doctored. This is done on a routine basis in cases where tapes are involved,â she said.
Lieberman said even though Cosby is set to be sentenced on Sept. 25, itâs still not too late to right the wrong.
âFirst, the court should order that the tape be analyzed. If it is doctored, then a mistrial should be declared, and his conviction should be thrown out,â Lieberman said.
âThe prosecutors should be reprimanded, and the defense attorneys should return the fees Cosby paid them. Otherwise, they should be sued for malpractice. If his conviction isnât thrown out, he can appeal on the basis of ineffective representation by counsel,â she said.